Food Sovereignty: A Breviary

By on 11/21/2013 in featured with 1 Comment

I was very pleased to write this piece for The Financial Times and very pressed to condense the idea of ‘food sovereignty’ down to 600 words. If you’d like to know more, here’s a slightly lengthier treatment.

Keep Reading »

This Land Is Our Land?

By on 11/21/2013 in featured with 1 Comment

Bob St Peter, a man about whom you’ll be hearing a great deal over the next few years, co-wrote this piece with me for the good people at Civil Eats. Thanks to them, and everyone who donated to support their Kickstarter project.

Keep Reading »

Kent, OH

By on 10/15/2013 in Events with No Comments

October 22 at 7:30 p.m. in the Kent Student Center in Room 306.
More details here

Ithaca, NY

By on 10/15/2013 in Events with No Comments

A History of Good & Bad Ideas to Feed the World
160 Mann, Cornell University
7pm, Wednesday, October 16th
Sponsored by the Food Collective

Going against Duflo

By on 10/9/2013 in Uncategorized with No Comments

In the past, I’ve linked to pieces that challenge the ethically untroubled, and systemically timid work of  Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, of Poor Economics fame. If you’re unfamiliar with their work, the quick summary is this: they start with the idea that poor people aren’t as dumb as development theories have tended to make them out. This is laudable, though not particularly original. Poor people have, for quite some time, been telling people that they are professors of their own poverty. Banerjee and Duflo suggest that perhaps the ideas that poor people come up with to survive poverty are better than the policies crafted for them in Washington. So far, so good.

The trouble is that when it comes to fixing poverty, the theories of poor people don’t seem to matter much. What is most important is What Works. Banerjee and Duflo’s rigorously clinical approach – they use randomized controlled trials to test What Works – transcends ideology to reveal that bed nets and deworming are good ideas.

Again, nothing terribly objectionable here. Except that this approach limits the extent to which poor people are allowed to be clever. The extent of their intelligence is reduced to rats in a maze, figuring out what works under the benign and compassionate supervision of ‘practical visionaries‘at MIT. If there are ways that poor people want to change their relation to power, we’ll never know. These are not subject to randomized controlled trials.

Let’s call this fixation with What Works “Millennial Economics”. To be obsessed with What Works is always to exclude consideration of how the context of what works might be different. What works when you’re being beaten is to move away from the dude with the baton. It’s a rational solution that many poor people have arrived at using their own faculties of reason.

But surely the police shouldn’t have been beating you in the first place. Protesting against the police, demanding that the police be held accountable, this too can work. But it requires politics, not technocracy. It means ideology, not expertise. For a generation – for a society – that looks to Washington and sees politics hopelessly divided, who wouldn’t want to stick with What Works? Except, of course, that Washington isn’t terribly interested in much beyond a tiny spectrum of difference between plutocrats whose bickering has brought the very idea of politics into disrepute. It’s a context in which Banerjee and Duflo’s reasonableness is refreshing. Even if their own politics crushes those of poor people. And even if what you’re left with is a few splats of policy ideas, because the theory that might have connected and made sense of them has been erased, because methodologically suspect and politically polluted.

If you want to read a general critique, have a look at Sanjay Reddy’s piece, one of the best in the genre. And if you want to see how Banerjee and Duflo get it wrong on food, here’s something hot off the presses. An old friend and teacher – Porus Olpadwala – has just published a fine analysis in Social Scientist. He takes Banerjee and Duflo to task for their 2011 Foreign Policy piece. The PDF’s below the fold. Keep Reading »

Berkeley, CA

By on 10/9/2013 in Events with No Comments

I’ll be co-teaching the Edible Education 101 class with Michael Pollan at Berkeley. More details will be posted on the Edible Schoolyard site. Public attendance will be limited, but the course will be available online, as a free MOOC. Details to come!

San Francisco CA

By on 09/25/2013 in Events with No Comments
Wed, Oct 2 2013 – 6:30pm

Finding Justice, Health, Security and Sustainability in Good Food

Jason Mark, Editor, Earth Island Journal; Co-manager, Alemany Farm
Nick Saul, CEO, Community Food Centres Canada; Author, The Stop
Raj Patel, Activist; Author, Stuffed and Starved
Nikki Henderson, Executive Director, People’s Grocery

Keep Reading »

New Haven, CT

By on 08/1/2013 in Events with No Comments

Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue
September 14–15, 2013
Yale University

More details here.

The G8′s “Diet Coke Plus” Politics

By on 06/12/2013 in featured with No Comments

This piece was originally posted at The Guardian.

Keep Reading »

Wendy’s Promises are as Empty as a Fast Food Calorie

By on 06/7/2013 in featured with No Comments

This piece was originally posted at The Huffington Post

Wendy’s, the world’s third largest burger joint, is having a makeover. From being “Wendy’s Old Fashioned Burgers” we’re now told it’s just “Wendy’s.” The ginger-haired befreckled Wendy remains on the logo, though in their TV spots she’s a hipper twentysomething. Yet behind the new facade lie some very old-fashioned attitudes.

CIW Protest outside Wendy's
CIW Protest outside Wendy’s (Credit:CIW) Keep Reading »